Liquid Assets- Capital ways to save water

28 February 2015 - By: Cornelia Eisenach

Liquid Assets- Capital ways to save water

Treatment of landfill leachate using BioHaven® technology
Treatment of landfill leachate using BioHaven® technology.McLeans Pit, Town of Greymouth, South Island, New Zealand.
Image provided by Leela O’Dea.


By Cornelia Eisenach

"Water, water, everywhere,

And all the boards did shrink;

Water, water, everywhere,

Nor any drop to drink. "

Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the Ancyent Marinere [1798]

We might not be quite as desperate as our ancient mariner yet, but those fresh drops are running low. And not only in arid regions of the world that are plagued by droughts and restricted access to fresh drinking water. “Water scarcity and therefore access to clean drinking water is particularly important in semi-arid regions such as the Mediterranean area, but also in other regions where water demand approaches, or even exceeds, water availability. This includes large areas of Europe”, says Dr. Nick Voulvoulis, whose research focuses on water and environmental management at Imperial College London, UK. Certainly, as our ancient mariner experienced, the majority of our planet’s water is too salty for us to drink, or feed our plants and animals. In addition, over-use and water pollution “not only threaten our water security but nature itself, with the removal, or impairment of aquatic ecosystems and the services that they can provide to us”, explains Dr Voulvoulis, adding that more integrated sustainable solutions are needed.

Saltier bacteria – fresher water

Water is a limited resource only as fresh water so tapping into the oceans would help address our rising fresh water demands.  Countries with access to sea water have been employing a technique called reverse osmosis to desalinate water for use in agriculture and although this technique has been developed and improved over the decades, it has one major flaw: it consumes a lot of energy. “This is where biology comes in, because there is nothing like biology when it comes to exploiting energy”, says Prof. Anna Amtmann, who leads an EPSRC-funded, multi-disciplinary research team in the UK to tackle the problem of fresh water availability.

She and her team have come up with a biology-based idea to desalinate without the need for large energy input using photosynthetic cyanobacteria. These bacteria live and grow on sunlight, they survive in seawater and they can grow to large densities. “Sodium salt is toxic to many organisms, even those that live and thrive in sea water”, says Amtmann. However, cyanobacteria possess plasma membrane proteins (an ATP-powered proton pump and a Na+/ H+ exchanger that exploits the pump’s proton gradient) that force out salt and so allow the bacteria to grow and reproduce in salt water. Once the cyanobacteria grow to high densities they run out of the ATP necessary to extrude the salt and, as a result begin to take up sodium and chloride. The team intend to enhance this biological process further using a relatively new synthetic biology technique called ‘optogenetics’, in which  a light-powered transport system enhances salt uptake by the bacteria.

This optogenetic technique uses halorhodopsin, a specialist protein found in halobacteria that pumps chloride ions inside the cell when it is stimulated by light. Amtmann’s team set out to genetically manipulate the cyanobacteria to express halorhodopsin: the pump will use the sun’s natural energy to drive chloride accumulation inside the cyanobacteria and the chloride-concentration gradient will draw in sodium. “We have already made progress in a proof-of-principle approach, where we were able to manipulate membrane potential by expressing halorhodopsin”, says Amtmann.

The team has also shown that simply growing and removing cyanobacteria from sea water already reduces the water’s salt content considerably. Sodium chloride adsorbs to cyanobacteria, possibly due to so-called extracellular polymeric substances that are contained within the cell wall and that act like salt scavengers. “We have characterised the chemical and physical properties of these substances and found that they change depending on the salt concentration”, says Amtmann. “Now it’s a matter of identifying the genes in the pathway that underlie this whole metabolism so as to exploit it further”, [2].

 

Wired up bacteria

The power of bacteria has been harnessed in the waste-water treatment industry for a long time. However, as with conventional desalination plants, waste-water treatment plants consume a lot of energy. So water engineers have been looking to biology to clean water without a large expense of energy. “Many of these energy-efficiency treatments rely on anaerobic processes involving complex microbial communities”, says Dr. Federico Aulenta of the Water Research Institute, IRSA-CNR in Monterotondo, Italy. He explains that one biological approach to clean waste water is indeed called anaerobic digestion. If you have ever seen images of bubbles arising from lake floors or from water-logged boggy land, you have an idea of what this process looks like. Anaerobic digestion involves distinct metabolic steps and each step is carried out by a different class of microbe such as acetogenic or methanogenic bacteria. These different microbes live in what is called syntrophic association, that is they link up their specialised metabolisms to form a conversion chain that breaks down the organic matter all the way to methane. The electrons arising from the initial oxidation of organic matter are passed on between microbes through a process called interspecies electron transfer. Ultimately, these electrons are used to reduce carbon dioxide to methane.

Aulenta and his team have recently discovered that this process can be boosted by the addition of conductive nanoparticles. These nanoparticles, made up of the natural mineral magnetite, enhance the transformation of organic matter to methane by boosting interspecies electron transfer, essentially ‘wiring up’ the different bacteria involved in the process. Reported in a recent publication, the researchers demonstrated that if they added the magnetite nanoparticles to anaerobic sludge, the production rate of methane from a model substrate could be increased by up to 33% [3].

 

Hungry for electrons

As well as microorganisms being able to transfer electrons from the oxidation of organic matter to other microbes, they can also transfer them to extracellular electron acceptors, for example, an electrode. This means they can generate electric current from fuel, e.g. organic matter, a principle exploited in microbial fuel cells. However, Aulenta is actually interested in reversing this process to tackle the problem of ground water contamination by industrial pollutants. “Chlorinated solvents are priority pollutants”, he says. “It is estimated that 80% of our contaminated ground water contains these solvents, due to improper storage, handling and accidental spills”.

Wastewater treatment lagoon
Wastewater treatment lagoon in Kerepehl, New Zealand 


This is where ‘electron transfer’ comes in: The electrodes donate electrons to the microbes which in turn pass them on to chlorinated solvents, as they use them as a substrate for their respiration. “These anaerobic microorganisms, such as Dehalococcoides, ‘respire’ the solvent, reducing it to ethylene, which is non-hazardous”, explains Aulenta.

But how easy is it to take what works in the laboratory to a real-life problem? Prof. Mark Riley, who heads the Biological Systems Engineering Department at the University of Lincoln-Nebraska, U.S.A., answers: “To develop a technology for a broad application the process has to be taken from a laboratory scale, via a small pilot scale to full scale. However, a system that works well on a small scale does not necessarily perform with the same efficiency or outcome when scaled-up.  This challenge is often seen in the pharmaceutical industry which by necessity must put much effort into this scale-up process”. This is an issue for Aulenta who says: “The key challenges of these technologies is loss of efficiency when you scale up electrochemical reactors. The larger the reactor, the poorer the performance”. To address this challenge Aulenta and his collaborators are going to take a small step towards scaling up their chlorinated solvent decontamination and will soon run a demonstrative test at a real contaminated site in northern Italy.

 

Safe haven for microbes

Wetlands, which are a natural habitat for water-cleaning biodegrading bacteria, are fast disappearing from the planet. In Ireland, for example, 90% of the wetlands have been transformed into agricultural land since the industrial revolution. Prof. Miklas Scholz from The University of Salford, UK, explains: “The transformation of wetlands into agricultural land is having a detrimental effect on the environment and climate change as carbon that had been locked away has now been released as CO2 and methane.” Scholz chairs the Civil Engineering Research Group at Salford and focuses on the use of so-called ‘Integrated Constructed Wetlands’ in waste water treatment. The principle of this technique is simple: you need a large area of land, divide it into wetland areas, apply a substrate, and seed or allow plants to settle on it and flood it with waste water. The surface will be covered by about 20 cm of waste water. The natural degradation processes performed partly by plants and mostly by microbes remove contaminants from farmland run-off, agricultural or domestic waste water [4].

Integrated Constructed Wetland
Integrated Constructed Wetland located near Waterford, Ireland. Photo: Dr Rory Harrington




Surprisingly, it is even possible to build wetlands in the form of artificial floating islands. “BioHaven® is a commercially available floating wetland”, explains Leela O’Dea, an ecologist and founding partner at the aquatic environmental consulting firm frog environmental. “It is about six inches deep and made up of a recycled plastic matrix, which allows plants to grow on it”. The floating island allows plants to grow with their roots dangling down into the water. “The advantage of this system is that the roots offer a really high surface area for microbial and sedimentation processes to take place”, says O’Dea. “There are a lot of microscopic particles or colloids suspended in the water and the dangling roots, which are covered with a sticky biofilm of microbes, help the sedimentation of these colloids”. Once the roots become heavy they drop off and carry the contaminants away into the sediment at the bottom of the water. “The sedimentation process is especially important for the removal of phosphorus”, says O’Dea, “because phosphorous often adsorbs to soil particles and so gets trapped in colloids.”

Microbial processes such as nitrification, denitrification and ammonification contribute the lion’s share to a floating wetland’s efficiency. “We estimate that plants manage 6-8% of the treatment efficiency, either through direct uptake or transformation processes. From microbes, however, we get a 61-63% treatment value”, says O’Dea. Despite the huge workload on the microbes, plants can be used in integrated or floating wetland systems depending on their ability to accumulate certain contaminants, for example heavy metals. “We do look at the phytoremediation a plant can offer. For example, we can add Iris to the island which aids treatment of water with lead contamination”, says O’Dea.

Miklas Scholz has been involved in a project examining the use of constructed wetlands in arsenic removal [5]. Scholz says: “If you use plants known to hyperaccumulate certain contaminants in a freshly set-up wetland system, you can actually see differences in treatment efficiency. But as the system matures, this effect lessens as other natural species out compete the hyperaccumulators”. Scholz believes that other benefits of constructed wetlands, such as attracting natural flora and fauna, creating biodiversity and offering room for recreational activities, should be factored into the equation of cost and energy efficiency when considering treating and decontaminating our water: “Research should not only compare and contrast the most advanced treatment methods but also consider alternative techniques”.

 

 

References:


1.
Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011) National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 50, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands.

2. Amezaga, J. M., Amtmann, A., Biggs, C. A., Bond, T., Gandy, C. J., Honsbein, A., Karunakaran, E., Lawton, L., Madsen, M. A., Minas, K., Templeton, M. R. (2014) Biodesalinatio: A Case Study for Applications of Photosynthetic Bacteria in Water Treatment. Plant Physiology, 164 (4), 1661-1676

3. Viggi, C. C., Rossetti, S., Fazi, S., Paiano, P., Majone, M., Aulenta, F. (2014). Magnetide Particles Trigger a Faster and More Robust Syntrophic Pathway of Methanogenic Proprionate Degradation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48 (13), pp 7536–7543

4. Dzakpasu M., Scholz M., McCarthy V. and Jordan S. (2015) Assessment of Long-term Phosphorus Retention in an Integrated Constructed Wetland Treating Domestic Wastewater. Environm. Sci. Pollut. Res., 22(1), pp. 305–313.

5. Wu M., Li Q., Tang X., Huang Z., Lin L. and Scholz M. (2014) Arsenic(V) Removal in Wetland Filters Treating Drinking Water with Different Substrates and Plants. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 94(6): 618–638.

 

 

Category: Plant Biology
Share
Cornelia Eisenach-RS

Cornelia Eisenach

Originally from Berlin, Cornelia completed her PhD research in Plant Cell and Molecular Biology at Glasgow University. Apart from researching plant ion channels she also helped to establish and contributed to the GIST, a Glasgow-based popular science magazine, worked at science outreach events with kids and gathered work experience at the BBC. Since 2013 she has been a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Zürich, Switzerland, and works as a science writer for the SEB, the Neue Zürcher Zeitung and SciViews.